Staff Reports
Peggy Noonan, the celebrated Wall Street Journal columnist and former speechwriter for Ronald Reagan, has recently turned her pen toward Vice President Kamala Harris. Known for her eloquence and insightful commentary, Noonan has carved out a reputation for speaking truth to power, even when it means taking shots at fellow Democrats. Despite her lack of fondness for Donald Trump, her recent op-ed makes one thing clear: Kamala Harris is far from impressive and has a remarkable talent for dodging the tough questions.
According to Noonan, Harris has mastered the art of avoidance. Rather than engaging in substantive discussions about her policies or beliefs, the Vice President seems content with delivering vague and empty responses. This behavior has reached new heights as Harris struggles to articulate clear answers on pressing issues like illegal immigration and the national debt. Instead, she delivers a series of incoherent responses that do little to alleviate concerns about her capability to lead.
From @WSJopinion: Kamala Harris Is an Artless Dodger by @Peggynoonannyc https://t.co/M1l7E4aryU
— The Wall Street Journal (@WSJ) September 21, 2024
In her critique, Noonan points out that Harris had ample opportunity to clarify her positions since being elevated to the role of presidential contender. But instead of seizing this chance, the Vice President remains reticent, leaving voters with more questions than answers. The situation has only worsened in recent interviews, where Harris appears less like a seasoned politician and more like an amateur trying to perform a stand-up routine. The impression left by her performance is far from presidential, and voters are left wondering if she truly has the qualifications necessary to take on such a significant role.
Noonan does not stop at mere observations; she goes a step further by labeling Harris’s behavior as disrespectful to the American people. The refusal to address critical issues directly is described as a form of political malpractice. Voters deserve clarity, especially on topics like taxation, regulation, and government spending. Harris’s reluctance to engage openly is not just frustrating; it reflects a troubling attitude toward accountability that the electorate should not tolerate.
Interestingly, some on the left, including prominent figures like Hillary Clinton, argue that Harris can dodge these questions because her focus should be on defeating Donald Trump. This stance reveals a dangerous trend—a prioritization of party loyalty over transparency and substance. Americans deserve to know where their leaders stand on critical issues, and dismissing these inquiries as unnecessary is an affront to democratic principles.
While Noonan’s views may not align with every conservative perspective, her criticisms of Harris resonate deeply in today’s political climate. The idea of an “artless dodger” representing the nation sends shivers down the spine of any patriot concerned about the direction of the country. With Kamala Harris in a leading role, the hope for a return to American exceptionalism feels increasingly fragile.
