Staff Reports
A judge in New York has blocked the addition of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) to the state's November election ballot, dealing a blow to advocates of abortion rights and measures against discrimination based on "gender identity" and "pregnancy outcomes." The judge's decision centered on procedural issues, as lawmakers did not seek a formal opinion from the state attorney general before approving the amendment's language.
Ed Cox, the state GOP Chairman, criticized the Legislature for hastily pushing through the amendment without holding hearings or consulting external experts. He also challenged the need for the ERA to protect abortion rights in New York, suggesting that existing laws already ensure those protections.
Abortion rights ballot amendment on ice in New York after judge rejects measure – Washington Examiner https://t.co/8xH5038MyH
— Deenie (@deenie7940) May 7, 2024
Following the ruling, New York Democratic Attorney General Letitia James voiced her disappointment, indicating plans to appeal the decision. James stressed that the ERA was designed to protect fundamental rights, including reproductive freedom and access to abortion, and that it would have been a crucial step in advancing equality in the state.
The setback is a significant blow for Democrats, who had anticipated that the ballot measure would draw voters in the upcoming election. While New York is typically a Democratic stronghold, some key House races are expected to be fiercely contested this November.
The Cook Political Report has identified seven House seats in New York as highly competitive, with three of those considered toss-ups, all held by Republican incumbents. However, the report describes Senator Kirsten Gillibrand's seat as "Solid" Democrat, and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer is not up for reelection until 2028.
This ruling could have a considerable impact on New York's political landscape and might influence voter turnout in the approaching election. The decision underscores the ongoing debates over reproductive rights and discrimination protections, highlighting the challenges in navigating the legal and political processes involved in state-level amendments.
